Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 vs. NPH plus regular human insulin in type 2 diabetes patients; a cost-effectiveness study

Farshchi, A. and Aghili, R. and Oskuee, M. and Rashed, M. and Noshad, S. and Kebriaeezadeh, A. and Kia, M. and Esteghamati, A. (2016) Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 vs. NPH plus regular human insulin in type 2 diabetes patients; a cost-effectiveness study. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 16 (1).

[img] Text
Biphasic-insulin-Aspart-30-vs-NPH-plus-regular-human-insulin-in-type-2-diabetes-patients-a-costeffectiveness-study2016BMC-Endocrine-DisordersOpen-Access.pdf

Download (661kB)
Official URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2....

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, costs, and cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) with NPH plus regular human insulin (NPH/Reg) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: It was a Single-center, parallel-group, randomized, clinical trial (Trial Registration: NCT01889095). One hundred and seventy four T2DM patients with poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1c � 8 (63.9 mmol/mol)) were randomly assigned to trial arms (BIAsp 30 and NPH/Reg) and were followed up for 48 weeks. BIAsp 30 was started at an initial dose of 0.2-0.6 IU/Kg in two divided doses and was titrated according to the glycemic status of the patient. Similarly, NPH/Reg insulin was initiated at a dose of 0.2-0.6 IU/Kg with a 2:1 ratio and was subsequently titrated. Level of glycemic control, hypoglycemic events, direct and indirect costs, quality adjusted life year (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio have been assessed. Results: HbA1c, Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and two-hour post-prandial glucose (PPG) were improved in both groups during the study (P < 0.05 for all analyses). Lower frequencies of minor, major, and nocturnal hypoglycemic episodes were observed with BIAsp 30 (P < 0.05). Additionally, BIAsp 30 was associated with less weight gain and also higher QALYs (P < 0.05). Total medical and non-medical costs were significantly lower with BIAsp 30 as compared with NPH/Reg (930.55 ± 81.43 USD vs. 1101.24 ± 165.49 USD, P = 0.004). Moreover, BIAsp 30 showed lower ICER as a dominant alternative. Conclusions: Despite being more expensive, BIAsp 30 offers the same glycemic control as to NPH/Reg dose-dependently and also appears to cause fewer hypoglycemic events and to be more cost-effective in Iranian patients with type 2 diabetes. © 2016 The Author(s).

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: cited By 2
Subjects: WK Endocrine System
QV Pharmacology
Depositing User: eprints admin
Date Deposited: 04 Jul 2018 10:19
Last Modified: 20 Oct 2019 10:43
URI: http://eprints.iums.ac.ir/id/eprint/3553

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item