Hydroxychloroquine plus standard of care compared with standard of care alone in COVID-19: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Amani, B. and Khanijahani, A. and Amani, B. (2021) Hydroxychloroquine plus standard of care compared with standard of care alone in COVID-19: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Scientific Reports, 11 (1).

[img]
Preview
Text
Hydroxychloroquine plus standard of care compared with standard of care alone in COVID-19 a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.pdf

Download (3MB) | Preview
Official URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2....

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in treating coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is disputed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of HCQ in addition to standard of care (SOC) in COVID-19. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of sciences, and medRxiv were searched up to March 15, 2021. Clinical studies registry databases were also searched for identifying potential clinical trials. The references list of the key studies was reviewed to identify additional relevant resources. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and Jadad checklist. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan software (version 5.3). Eleven randomized controlled trials with a total number of 8161 patients were identified as eligible for meta-analysis. No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups in terms of negative rate of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Risk ratio RR: 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90, 1.08; P = 0.76), PCR negative conversion time (Mean difference MD: � 1.06, 95% CI � 3.10, 0.97; P = 0.30), all-cause mortality (RR: 1.09, 95% CI 1.00, 1.20; P = 0.06), body temperature recovery time (MD: � 0.64, 95% CI � 1.37, 0.10; P = 0.09), length of hospital stay (MD: � 0.17, 95% CI � 0.80, 0.46; P = 0.59), use of mechanical ventilation (RR: 1.12, 95% CI 0.95, 1.32; P = 0.19), and disease progression (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.37, 1.85; P = 0.64). However, there was a significant difference between two groups regarding adverse events (RR: 1.81, 95% CI 1.36, 2.42; P < 0.05). The findings suggest that the addition of HCQ to SOC has no benefit in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Additionally, it is associated with more adverse events. © 2021, The Author(s).

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: cited By 0
Uncontrolled Keywords: antivirus agent; hydroxychloroquine, comparative study; drug therapy; health care quality; human; information processing; meta analysis; pathogenicity; randomized controlled trial (topic); treatment outcome, Antiviral Agents; COVID-19; Data Management; Humans; Hydroxychloroquine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; SARS-CoV-2; Standard of Care; Treatment Outcome
Subjects: WC Communicable Diseases
Depositing User: eprints admin
Date Deposited: 07 Aug 2021 03:37
Last Modified: 07 Aug 2021 03:37
URI: http://eprints.iums.ac.ir/id/eprint/38831

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item